New Head Gasket Design from Ford

Log in to reply

Home Forums Performance Engine New Head Gasket Design from Ford

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 24 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #71495

    Kenny
    Keymaster

    UK - Scotland

    Posts: 3885

    New vs Old MK3 Focus RS head gasket design

    The first one is the one you will be getting from Ford right now, the bottom one is the old head gasket.

    *Not my photos but are genuine from a car with the head gasket problem.

    New Head Gasket Mk3 Focus RS

    Old Head Gasket Mk3 Focus RS

    #71496

    Kenny
    Keymaster

    UK - Scotland

    Posts: 3885

    Close ups

    Close Up Photo

    #71503

    RS77
    Participant

    UK - England

    Posts: 1271

    What’s the fitting protocol? All cars before Aug 2017?

    #71505

    gary1234
    Participant

    UK - England

    Posts: 902

    Pop good point

    #71506

    hillman998
    Participant

    New Zealand

    Posts: 59

    Reinz reasons for MLS gasket failure

    For the technical minded have a read of this link and compare the images

    Hope I never get to see one first hand but the article would suggest that the potential cause(s) might be blowby from excessively high combustion pressures, rough sealing surfaces, component distortions, or inadequate compression of the cylinder-head gasket.  I’d still like to see a communication to owners from Ford that confirmed the underlying cause.

    A gasket alone may not be sufficient say for example if the vmin or vmax roughness on the head is outside the spec for the gasket or the liners where moving but would work if say the head bolt torque was not set correctly on installation.

    Its potentially not an expensive fix, unless you have 20,000 cars affected, but one many owners of modified cars may be happy to contribute to as a precautionary measure, or even do themselves.  Certainly better than a whole heap of warranty claims and bad publicity, not to mention all the hype in the media.

    #71508

    RS77
    Participant

    UK - England

    Posts: 1271

    Kenny – why do I get the feeling you know something we don’t!

    #71509

    Kenny
    Keymaster

    UK - Scotland

    Posts: 3885

    This was just shared by someone else I was just passing it on 🙂

    Seems it is not the head gasket but more of the block design thats the issue.

    #71510

    white-rs2
    Participant

    UK - England

    Posts: 4832

    So these New and Old head gasket designs.

    This is what we should of fitted!! Or like the Bullseye game show this is what you “could” of won lol

    Is this going to be a general recall on cars produced up to month ?? 2017 or a fix as they blow situation??

    • Fix as they blow.

    Probably be the most cost effective measure Ford could undertake. but probably the worst PR route.

    • A general recall from ?? 2016 to ?? 2017 for head gasket replacement and correct head bolt torque setting.

    This option would generally be Fords last choice simply due to cost, but their best PR opportunity in this whole engine fiasco.

    Just some general thoughts as I’m inbetween assignments here in work.



    RS Edition.

    FPM375 Rocks

    The rest of the “M” maps suck

    #71512

    71-bda
    Participant

    UK - England

    Posts: 9258

    I don’t feel confident in that at all ! I think it will just be a stop gap to buy a bit of time. Lets see who’s blows first with the latest headgasket!  I’m sure the problem lies in the open deck design allowing a wee bit of movement and causing headgasket failure. You should not build an engine where the headgasket has to try and keep the liners in place ! Shall worry a bit more about it in  4 years time if its not cured completely then fit a closed deck mod/ or closed deck block hopefully in production by then ! or ST block !



    No nothing.

    No Mods. No rockers. Just a chunky knob, thats now been replaced by an RS knob innit.

    No tackiness.

    Std as Ford intended, but with a space saver wheel and jack and nuts and wheel brace. oh.. and flaps, a man has got to have flaps.

    Innit?

     

    #71524

    RS77
    Participant

    UK - England

    Posts: 1271

    I’m not an expert, but others have said there’s nothing inherently wrong with an open deck design. Other manufacturers use this without issue. However, I guess it’s the sum of the parts that determine the outcome. Looks to me like there’s very little surface area between the bores, so the HG has its work cut out maintaining a seal and holding the cylinders from flexing. Also, the sealing area is much reduced on the new one and varies in its location.

    However, I agree that it’s probably a stop gap and changing the gasket alone will not be enough. But at least Ford have acknowledged there’s an issue and appear to be doing something.

    #71525

    adh1964
    Participant

    UK - Wales

    Posts: 180

    so guys do you think we will get a recall from ford for this new gasket, its the least they can do

    #71526

    71-bda
    Participant

    UK - England

    Posts: 9258

    no I dont expect a recall. If it ain’t broke, dont fix it. They will just replace the gasket with the latest spec one when the old one has failed. You dont fill a tooth until its been decayed and needs drilling and fixing.



    No nothing.

    No Mods. No rockers. Just a chunky knob, thats now been replaced by an RS knob innit.

    No tackiness.

    Std as Ford intended, but with a space saver wheel and jack and nuts and wheel brace. oh.. and flaps, a man has got to have flaps.

    Innit?

     

    #71527

    adh1964
    Participant

    UK - Wales

    Posts: 180

    Mike, how much would it cost do you think to replace a gasket with labour i know the gasket is the cheapest of the two, i’m no mechanic but if your head gasket fails it doesn’t mean new engine though does it?

    #71528

    o1turbo30v
    Participant

    USA

    Posts: 160

    You guys are correct, the headgasket is just a stop gap the larger problem is in the head material and or the head finish (roughness), the rev C headgasket fixes some manufacturing errors (like an extra hole) and allows for a greater variance in head finish. There’s nothing wrong with the open deck design (as long as you don’t drive at 7250rpms all day long), its been proven relatively reliable in 450wtq+ Mustangs. Here in the US just this past week a RS was about to get a HG replaced with the current Rev C gasket, at the last minute Ford called the dealership and said to wait for a new head to be shipped, i believe this is going to be the “recall”, a new Rev C gasket and a new cylinder head for pre July 2017 built cars.

    Lets keep the pressure on Ford. Now once this gets sorted lets start to worry about our yearly tire costs 🙂

    #71529

    71-bda
    Participant

    UK - England

    Posts: 9258

    70 years ago BRM managed to get a 1500cc engine to withstand 80 pounds of boost ( 5.5 bar ) and produce 600bhp without headgasket failure !!! If only the Focus sounded as AWESOME !!…you need headphones or stereo speakers and a sub for the full effect !



    No nothing.

    No Mods. No rockers. Just a chunky knob, thats now been replaced by an RS knob innit.

    No tackiness.

    Std as Ford intended, but with a space saver wheel and jack and nuts and wheel brace. oh.. and flaps, a man has got to have flaps.

    Innit?

     

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 24 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Please login or register to view this page.




Login or register below to contribute to New Head Gasket Design from Ford. If you're not already a member then you can register for free!